In this guide, I’ll show you the best Ad Blocker that works for YouTube. But you can block the ads without paying or buying its premium subscription. Officially, YouTube offers its premium service to watch videos without ads. Nowadays, most people are annoyed with YouTube ads and they want to get rid of them. I will leave EasyList disabled and while I will keep an eye out, I doubt I will see any difference in what lands in front of my eyeballs.Īs for memory leaks – never seen them.Finding the best YouTube Ad Blocker? If yes, then you are at the right destination. Clearly, AdBlock Plus chews thru resources – appreciably slowing complex sites with many ads/wdigets/whatever such as amazon/FB. Additionally my computer at “rest” is now 3 degrees cooler on average. Same for amazon – it would always takes a while to load eveything, machine would start being noisy (in my enclosed server cabinet) and the temps would jump 10 degrees. Without the EasyList filter – I just loaded FaceBook (my normal custom list landing page) and no noise, MUCH faster loading. I have a temperature monitoring in my system tray – and I know for a fact when I to Facebook, my machine makes more noise and my temp rises an extra 10 degrees. hmmm… as I was typing this I thought I would check something. Results: FF newly opened went from 400mb with filter to 360mb without. I didn’t delete any items as you suggested – instead I have disabled EasyList (but left the Popup BlockList and my own custom filter of 10 items). I guess I nail everything before it gets thru to my browser (local proxy: privoxy) and if it gets past that, then RequestPolicy would kill it dead if it was third party – and then perhaps other extensions block it before AdBlock Plus (maybe NoScript gets there first?). I actually have the setting for show a placeholder enabled and I must say, I’ve never seen one of those either. and I’ve NEVER had any (although I did “reinstall it” (never removed it) the other day when testing Privacy Badger as I thought I has lost the toolbar icon, so that *may* have reset any counts). Well, I’ve been using AdBlock Plus (in this portable FF) since I set it up about 2 years ago – and I do not clean out extension data when “cleaning”. There does not seem to be a solution though for that issue at the moment, other than creating and using custom filter lists exclusively that use less information and are therefore considerably smaller in size. It offers additional insight into why the memory usage goes up by that much under certain circumstances. Some users have created their own custom lists to reduce it by a large margin, but that is probably not a solution that most users are willed to consider as it takes some time to implement.Ī bug has been filed on Bugzilla about Adblock Plus' high memory usage. If you are subscribed to Easylist or another large list, then this is the reason why the extension uses this much memory compared to vanilla Firefox installations. The main issue here is that the stylesheet that Adblock Plus uses for its functionality is loaded for each iFrame. Note: The test results of my own unscientific tests are the following: 188 Megybte and 300 Megabyte without Adblock Plus installed to 340 Megabyte and 1160 Megabyte respectively with it installed. With Adblock Plus, that memory usage increases to almost 2000 Megabyte. Without Adblock Plus installed, Firefox uses about 370 Megabytes when the page is loaded. The VIM Color Scheme Test page is an extreme example. On the popular tech news site Techcunch for example, RAM usage more than doubles if the iframes on the website are activated. That does not appear to be much, but if you consider that some sites may make use of many iframes, it can grow quickly. While that may be a lot depending on the installed memory on the computer, the difference can widen quickly under certain circumstances.įor every iframe that gets loaded in the browser, four additional Megabytes are added to the browser's memory usage. Adblock Plus adds an overhead to Firefox's memory usage of about 60-70 Megabyte. The difference is significant, especially under the right circumstances. Mozilla recently analyzed memory usage of a version of Firefox without add-ons installed, and a version with the most popular add-on Adblock Plus installed. While many add-ons are memory efficient, others may increase the memory usage by a lot. One of the reasons for this discrepancy in memory usage are add-ons. That does not mean that you may not see spikes in memory usage even if you open the same websites as someone else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |